Scott Peterson murder trial: Juror beaten by boyfriend offered immunity

A juror in the Scott Peterson trial has been offered immunity before testifying at a hearing that could determine whether a new trial is granted, authorities said.

Richelle Nice was Juror 7 in the trial that ended with Peterson's conviction for killing his pregnant wife, Laci Peterson, and their unborn son. 

However, Peterson's attorney said Nice was guilty of juror misconduct because she failed to reveal during the jury selection that she had been beaten by a boyfriend while she was pregnant. He said Peterson deserves a new trial.

The offer to Nice will come before she testifies at a Feb. 25 evidentiary hearing, Stanislaus County District Attorney Birgit Fladager announced Monday.

Peterson's lawyers want to overturn his murder conviction on grounds of bias and misconduct. They contend that Nice lied on a jury questionnaire when she denied having been the victim of a crime or involved in a lawsuit.

ALSO: SF police excessive force case that caused fight between DA, chief begins

Attorneys say Nice did not reveal during jury selection that she had been beaten by a boyfriend while pregnant in 2001. She also didn’t disclose that during another pregnancy she had obtained a restraining order - considered a type of lawsuit — against a boyfriend’s ex-girlfriend, whom she feared would hurt her unborn child.

"I don’t think you can make a cogent argument that somebody who is pregnant and has been the victim of violence can go into a trial and at the very least not feel some bias towards a circumstance where a victim is a pregnant woman who basically had violence occur," Peterson’s lawyer, Pat Harris, said Monday after the hearing.

Peterson’s attorneys have argued that she actively sought to join the jury because she wanted Peterson to be punished for the deaths.

She has denied it.

ALSO: Man accused of killing woman at Airbnb rental dies in Santa Clara County Jail

"I did not lie to get on this trial to fry Scott," she told the Modesto Bee in 2017.

Nice had said that without immunity — which could protect her from a perjury charge — she would invoke the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination. However, if she refuses to answer questions on the witness stand after being given immunity, Nice could be held in contempt of court.

Nice later wrote dozens of prison letters to Peterson while he was on death row. She also co-authored a book on the case with other jurors.

The evidentiary hearing will run about a week, following which the judge will then decide within 90 days whether to grant Peterson a new trial.

Peterson, 49, was sentenced to death in 2005 but he was resentenced to life without parole in December. The California Supreme Court tossed out his original sentence in 2020 on grounds that the jury was improperly screened for bias against the death penalty.

However, the justices also said in their decision that there was considerable circumstantial evidence incriminating Peterson in the first-degree murder of Laci and the second-degree murder of their unborn son.

Laci was eight months pregnant when Peterson killed her and their unborn son on Christmas Eve 2002, prosecutors said. Using his fishing boat, he dumped their bodies into the San Francisco Bay where they were found months later.

The Petersons lived in Modesto, but due to the relentless publicity around the search for Laci, the trial was moved to San Mateo County, where the hearing was streamed online and nearly 2,000 people watched it. 

KTVU contributed to this report.